


P.S Apakah hak penganut ugama lain mempersoalkan undang2 Islam? Dasar perikemanusiaan dan hak-hak kebebasan individu tidak boleh menghalalkan yang haram. Yang haram tetap haram. Mempolitikkan isu2 ugama untuk kepentingan peribadi adalah menjijikkan.
KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia – The Malaysian government has threatened action against the country's biggest English-language daily over an article criticizing the caning of three Muslim women, an official said Thursday.
The Home Ministry found the article published in The Star last Friday may threaten "public order," said Abdul Razak Abdul Latif, a senior ministry official.
The government threat against The Star is likely to fuel concerns that the government is succumbing to conservative Islamists who appear to be gaining influence in this Muslim-majority country. Malaysia has long been seen as a model of moderate and progressive Islamic society.
In the opinion piece, The Star managing editor P. Gunasegaram, a non-Muslim, criticized the Feb. 9 caning of three Muslim women for illicit sex, saying it undermined individual rights. The three became the first women to be caned in Malaysia, after an Islamic court found them guilty of having sex out of wedlock.
Abdul Razak, the home ministry official, said the ministry faxed a letter Wednesday to The Star, giving it 14 days to offer an apology and explanation before the ministry decides whether it will take any action, he said.
Action could include revoking the paper's publishing license. All of the country's publications need to annually renew their printing licenses to operate.
Following complaints, The Star removed the article from its Web site and printed an apology Wednesday, saying it was mindful that it needed to be sensitive to people's beliefs.
"We would like to categorically state that there was no intention to insult or offend Muslims with the article," it said.
Star editors could not immediately be reached. Abdul Razak said the printed apology was not enough to settle the matter, and that Star would have to reply to the ministry's letter.
The caning of the three women has caused debate in Malaysia. Rights group say it is a degrading punishment, and that civil law forbids the caning of women.
But the government insists it is a just penalty and the caning provided for under Shariah law does not inflict physical pain.
The country's Islamic courts _ which administer personal matters for Muslims _ can mete out caning sentences for such offenses as drinking alcohol in public and sex out of wedlock. Previously women had usually appealed the caning sentences so that no woman was ever caned.
Muslims make up 60 percent of the country's 28 million people. Non-Muslims are mainly ethnic Indian and Chinese.
Lim Kit Siang, a veteran opposition politician, condemned criticism of the article in a blog posting Wednesday.
"Right-thinking Malaysians are gravely concerned at the rise of intolerance and bigotry," he said. "Is Malaysia's plural society ... retreating into the shell of greater intolerance, bigotry and extremism?"
I am aware of your recent article which had been published by The Star and also had been deleted in all of the sudden after it catches the eyes of Malaysian people especially the Muslims.You said that caning a women is unacceptable by law. It against the right to privacy to have sex, and it violated the human rights.
Antara yang turut tersinggung:
Em, I suggest that you are a Hindu, P Gunasegaram.
I am a Muslim. I don’t complaint the syariah Law, why would you? Should you complaint that my law is redundant, therefore what are you guys doing during Thaipusam?
Doesn’t the kavadi hurts? Wouldn’t that against the law of our Federation which prohibits ourself to injure our own body?
Why are you guys walking along the fire? Why are you guys stabbing each other?
We have never interfere into your religion, my friend because we don’t give a damn to whatever you guys are into with whatever your business might be. We have never told you to stop doing all these kind of things. We have never told you that these beliefs are outdated and against human rights.
But suprisingly, you told us what is better and what is worse. You are more superior than our God.
P Gunasegaram, you have crossed the line. You are too much my friend. Too much.
www.writtenbyhim.wordpress.com

























Having always been a Mini fan, ever since I met this mechanic guy in Seremban in 1965 (I was just a kid then) who had a Cooper S that he raced at that then faraway place called Kuala Lumpur. At that time, he bragged about getting 8th position in a race. It impressed me then, but I now know that only winning first counts. Still, that incident left an indelible impression on me. My dream of being a racing driver was born out of that chance encounter, and although I have never had the opportunity to own a Cooper S, it has until today, remained one of my ambitions. I did own a Clubman for a short while, but that was a long time ago. For me, the allure of the Mini will always be there.
So when BMW Malaysia called me to ask if I would like to have the JCW Mini for a weekend, I dropped everything to collect it, and I have not regretted it one bit.
The Mini of today is very different from those little cars of fifty years ago; but the spirit lives on – the characteristic front grille, although much larger now, and more modern, still retains the character of the first Mini. The overall size is bigger, and the interior fittings are more luxurious, but the overall silhouette is much the same. It is like they took the original Mini, sealed it up, and pumped air into the innards to blow everything up into a bigger car.
Now with a 1.6 litre engine, turbo charged instead of supercharged, the Mini is more potent. The John Cooper Works model, dubbed JCW for short, is even more potent. It is the ultimate Mini, tweaked from the 175 horsepower of the Mini Cooper S to give 211 horsepower and 260Nm of torque form 1850 rpm to 5,600 rpm. Mated to a six-speed manual gearbox, the JCW streaks from zero to 100 km/h in 6.5 seconds and hits a top speed of 238 km/h, yet promises a fuel consumption figure of 6.9 litre per 100 kilometres (combined cycle). Our enthusiastic driving styles returned a more pessimistic 9.5 litre per 100 kilometres, but then nobody is complaining.
It was hard enough trying to get my hands on the car, with the rest of my test team all wanting to have a go with the JCW, but I sneakily pulled rank, saying I needed it to go up north, and that I did, putting 600 kilometres on the clock in one day, and enjoying every minute of it.
If you enjoy driving, especially fast driving, the JCW will give you nothing but sheer driving bliss; anyone could tell by looking at the gleam in my eyes, and the broad smile on my face every time I was behind the wheel. With the turbo on boost, the JCW nips in and out of traffic as if everybody else is standing still. It handles like a go-kart, and you simply point and squirt; it is that easy.
What really impresses is the ease of handling, the extreme stability, even at high speeds. At 200 km/h, the JCW, despite its relatively small size and short wheelbase, feels like it is going at 100 km/h. The humongous brakes are really reassuring, and the large 205/45 R 17 tyres keep you firmly planted all the time. The gear ratio in top gear gives you around 42 km/h per 1000 rpm, and allows for quick acceleration while keeping engine speed decently low at high speeds. With close ratio gears, though, you can shift down with ease, and cheekily overtake others at any time.
The driving experience I had with the JCW Mini is really something very memorable. I had loads of fun, and wished I could keep it longer. At RM270k, it is not something I can afford, although I am sure that it is worth every penny of it.
www.autoworld.com.my
This article also taken from www.autoworld.com.my
Is the base Accord 2.0 VTi all you really need? Or should you really splash the extra RM30k and go for the 2.4 VTi-L? KON tries to find out...
---
I was born the elder of two brothers, and like all good siblings, my brother and I fought all the way from our tender childhood right to our teenage years. We fought over ice-cream, we fought over space on the table, we fought over the front seat of the car, and pretty much anything you can think of. Though we have long since outgrown all that, the lessons we learned from those fights still linger in my memory.
Being three years elder, I was also naturally the bigger-sized sibling until my brother reached his puberty. However, my advantage in size did not always translate into winning of fights. My brother usually hits back with a great deal more aggression to even the odds. It has then been my observation that in a family of siblings, the younger ones tend to be more vocal, outspoken, and active, as if as to make up for the lack in size and stature of their elder brothers and sisters. (Note: Not always true)
This theory applies for cars too. For certain models, the smaller engine variants actually turn out to be better drives. More horsepower don't always equal more fun. The real driving pleasure is sometimes found in the lower end models where you have to work the engine harder, and also where less of the driving sensations are hampered by electronics.
Recently, when Honda lent us five of their cars for the Autoworld Safety & Defensive Driving Course, we had the opportunity to put this hypothesis to test on the Accord. The initial objective of this test was to see if the base 2.0 VTi good enough to meet your needs, or if the 2.4 VTi-L should really be the one to go for. However, the recent introduction of the new Accord 2.0 VTi-L has given this test a whole new significance; this now doubles as a pre-test drive for the new variant.
When this latest Accord was unveiled last year, Honda stunned us by presenting the biggest and boldest-looking car to ever wear the 'Accord' nameplate. The lines of the car meet at sharp angles to give it a look reeking of sleekness and aggression. At the same time, the pronounced character line on the car's waist visually stretches its length, further enhancing its road presence. From photos taken during the Defensive Driving Course, I can tell you that the Accord looks best sideways, and I mean going sideways.
After the Defensive Driving Course concluded, I went home in the Accord 2.4, and I was to meet Jaime the following day to swap for the 2.0. Our test car had an all-black leather trimmed interior, and came complete with auto cruise, power adjusted seats, and paddle shifters.
The dashboard combines a good deal of style and practicality. Its sweeping contours are pleasing to the eye, and there are plenty of storage compartments all-round, all with lids that open and close solidly. The glovebox is a notable exception to this rule as it closes noticeably out of alignment.
Otherwise, the ergonomics and build quality of the Accord is almost impeccable. Steering wheel adjusts for reach and rake, while the buttons on the dashboard controlling the dual-zone air-con and audio unit possess very good tactile feel when operated. The problem lies in figuring how to operate them. Although it proved easy to operate upon familiarization, the sheer amount of buttons on the dash make first time users feel as if as they are trying to access a super computer. For the less tech-savvy, the cluttered dashboard can seem intimidating.
The other complaint of an otherwise faultless interior is the folding seat back which, for one, does not even have split folding, and then requires you to pull a lever from the boot to unfasten the seat back, which you then have pull forwards from inside the passenger compartment. Why can't the mechanism be operated from inside the passenger compartment? Or why can't, upon pulling the release lever, the seat back just tumble forward on its own?
As I drove off in the 2.4, I was immediately impressed at how the car's massive bulk seemed to shrink around me. It gathered pace with serene ease, and changed direction with such agility that you simply would not expect from a front-wheel driven sedan of such massive proportions. Approaching long sweeping bends, just ease off a little upon entry, then gun the throttle on the apex, you will be astonished at how it just grips and goes. For sharper corners, calling the paddle shifts into action enables you to summon more traction from the lower gears to keep you in line.
A slight chink in the impeccable armour of the Accord's drive is the steering wheel, which although accurate, has too much feedback filtered out. You don't so much feel what the front wheels are doing, you only see where they're going by looking ahead.
That aside, there is little to fault about the Accord's handling, I absolutely loved it. I have little doubt that the chassis engineers at Honda placed sharp & precise handling at the top of the list, ahead of even comfort. This is because, on the 2.4, a substantial amount of the road undulations were transmitted to the cabin, indicating a stiff suspension setup. I personally have no issues with this, but the comfort-oriented crowd might not be too pleased.
After having the 2.4 for a night, I wasn't really keen to swap it for the 2.0 the following day. I have good reasons for this. First, have you looked at the rims of the thing? The massive visual bulk do not go at all well with the tiny 16" alloys. Think 523i. Second, during the previous morning, when my colleague Chris was driving this car, I saw that he was really struggling to keep up with my 1.5-litre Honda City. That, ladies and gentlemen, was bad news. I therefore had no doubts that the 2.0 is a good-for-nothing underpowered behemoth.
Not only that, it also happens to come with a good few toys less than the 2.4. Leather trim is now replaced with fabric, and the interior now features a two-tone black & beige colour scheme. The steering wheel is the same as the 2.4, but where there was the cruise control buttons on the 2.4, the 2.0 now has blanks button in place. The most unbelievable omission, in my opinion, is the variable speed function for the intermittent wipers - a feature that even Proton owners take for granted. Also gone, and this is the biggest miss, are the paddle shifts, as the standard selector lever does not include the option of manually selecting 4th gear, an annoying trademark of Honda 5-speed autos.
As I took the keys of the 2.0 the next day, I looked at the car with dread. You see, the point of the exercise was not to find out whether the 2.0 or the 2.4 is a better car, but rather how big is the difference between the two. I can live without most of the toys, but what I dread most would be how the thing feels when nail the throttle to the footwell. I could already anticipate it, the transmission kicks down, the revs climb up, but the speedo takes an eternity to build up speed. God help me...
There is simply no better of putting this, but, I was wrong. Dead wrong. The Accord 2.0 completely defied my expectations. It makes up for its deficit in cubes and horses against the 2.4 with a far greater eagerness and willingness to rev. It might not actually be faster, but it sure as hell feels faster. Where the 2.4 makes smooth and steady acceleration, the 2.0's smaller motor buzzes with excitement every time you stab on the throttle.
When you open the hood of the 2.0 and 2.4, you notice that not only the 2.4 has a nice shining engine cover, it also has a strut bar. This shows when you drive too. When you corner it hard, the 2.0 has noticeably more body roll than the 2.4. However, the steering feel of the 2.0 is better, as you actually get more feedback. There is no more need to guess what the front wheels are doing, you now feel what's going on.
It is an interesting contrast between the two. The 2.4 is the more civilized of the two. It makes its progress in a quiet and graceful manner. The 2.0 is different. It has less electronics, which means a less filtered and ultimately more satisfying driving experience. Ask yourself this, when faced with two little kids, which one are you more likely to fall in love with? The smarter one, or the playful one?
I liked the 2.4 a lot, but the 2.0 was nothing short of a revelation. That it makes do with less toys than the 2.4 ultimately does not matter. The only thing from the 2.4 that I really missed when I went to the 2.0 was the pair of paddle shifters, and those aren't worth RM30k. Between this two, the winner, and this is shocking, is the 2.0 VTi.
However, the arrival of the 2.0 VTi-L changes things completely. At an RM10k premium over the VTi, and packing most of the goodies found in the 2.4, that may well be THE Accord to buy.
This article was taken from www.autoworld.com.my.
As far as the Honda-Toyota rivalry goes, the arena in which the two giants contest each other most fiercely, at least in this part of the world, is the D-segment, where the Accord and Camry do battle. Nissan's withdrawal of the Cefiro has allowed the duo to exert an almost unshakable dominance over its rivals.
While the Ford Mondeo's impact on this segment remains to be seen, credible alternatives in the form of the Hyundai Sonata, Peugeot 407 and Mazda6 have yet to adversely impact the iron-clad grip of what one of our forummers dub the 'Cam-Cord' duopoly.
The simple fact is that when it comes to buying a large sedan with a budget in the region of RM150k, the Accord and Camry are the two main (sometimes, only) choices that spring to mind. Even if rivals offer superior products, almost none can beat the brand power, residual values, sales and service network which both Toyota and Honda have tirelessly built over the years.
Our national automotive policies have somewhat skewed the market, and along with it, the tastes and requirements of the Malaysian motorist. With some cars costing as much as houses, buying one is not an exercise which most Malaysians can indulge in with abandon. As a result, car buyers in this country are very sensitive to finance-related issues such as resale value, fuel consumption, and maintenance costs. So, while many may lust for the likes of the Alfa 159, BMW 3-series, Audi A4, or Mercedes C-class, come buying time, most end up signing on Honda or Toyota's dotted lines.
Accord vs Camry - The Big Picture
Discounting the Accord 3.5 V6, which is essentially an RM250k niche product, the Accord vs Camry battle is fought on three fronts - the entry level variants (2.0 VTi vs 2.0E), the mid-spec variants (2.0 VTi-L vs 2.0G), and the full-spec variants (2.4VTi-L vs 2.4V). It is worth noting that each variant of the Accord undercuts the equivalent Camry's price by a few thousand ringgit.
Honda did not originally have a direct competitor for the mid-spec Camry 2.0G, offering the Accord in only two trim levels - 2.0 VTi and 2.4 VTi-L. However, they were finally persuaded earlier this year to plug the RM30k gap between the 2.0 and the 2.4 with a new 2.0 VTi-L variant. Priced RM8k above the 2.0 VTi, the 2.0 VTi-L brings the 2.0 much closer to the 2.4 spec-level at a fraction of the price.
Two months down the road, Toyota responded by refreshing the entire Camry range, around since late 2006. Technically unchanged, the new-look Camry instantly comes across as a classier and more refined car than its predecessor. It offers the same three variants as before - 2.0E, 2.0G and 2.4V.
From data provided to us by MAA, this year, the Camry has outsold the Accord by some 1,651 units from January to October 2009 (6,900 vs 5,249). The best selling Camry is the 2.0G, with 3,258 units accounting for nearly half of the model's Jan-Oct 2009 sales.
Meanwhile, for the Accord, the base model 2.0 VTi accounts for the dominant proportion of sales with 2,546 units (49%) sold in the same period. However, it is worth noting that the new 2.0 VTi-L variant, launched in late July has quickly amassed 1,153 sales in three months. If averaged over the number of months the respective models had on the market, the 2.0 VTi-L works out to the best seller in the Accord range.
The hottest battle field between the two cars, therefore, takes place in the middle grounds, where the Accord 2.0 VTi-L is pitted against the Camry 2.0G. Now the volume sellers of their respective ranges, these two also appear on paper, the most balanced variants among their siblings. After much cajoling to both sides, I managed to procure a test unit of each car and pit them against each other in a battle royale.
Losing 400ccs
In many countries, the Camry and Accord model ranges start from the 2.4-litre variants and slowly move up to three-litre-plus v-sixers. Our displacement-unfriendly road tax regime means that the 2.4 versions now assume the flagship role while the smaller 2.0-litre variants serve to bring up sales volumes.
Neither the VTi-L nor the 2.0G loses a great deal in terms of equipment to their 2.4 siblings. For the Accord, opting for the 2.0 VTi-L over the 2.4 VTi-L saves you RM22k, but you have to do without the front strut bar, leather wrapped steering wheel, paddle shifts, side airbags, VSA, and auto leveling HID headlights. Deal breaker? Unlikely, you still get leather seats, power adjusting driver seat, and cruise control, items omitted from the 2.0 VTi.
For the Camry, the downgrade from 2.4V to 2.0G entails less sacrifice of equipment. You only lose the keyless start, steering wood grain finish (which we much rather omit!), traction control, and VSC. Your savings would be less than that of the Accord, but you still have an extra RM20k to pocket for forgoing the extra 400 cubes.
Looking at the bells and whistles alone, the Accord starts the contest at a disadvantage. Its equipment deficit against the Camry makes a sizable list - auto-leveling HID headlights, power adjusting passenger seat, trip computer, intermittent variable wipers, and forward parking sensors.
While it loses out in terms of features & equipment, the Accord quickly hits back in the technical half of the specs sheet. Compared to the Camry's, the Accord's powerplant, drivetrain, and chassis all boast greater levels of sophistication and technical trickery.
Powering the Accord is the 1,997cc R20A SOHC i-VTEC powerplant dispensing 154hp @ 6,300rpm and 189Nm @ 4,300rpm. The Camry meanwhile, gets the 1,998cc 1AZ-FE twin-cam VVT-i motor, which produces less horsepower than the Honda (145hp @ 6,000rpm) but slightly more torque (190Nm @ 4,000rpm). Evenly matched on paper.
However, in the transmission department, Honda has come up trumps as the Accord gets a five-speed automatic transmission against the Camry's four-speeder. The difference is even more pronounced when the Toyota's unit does not even have an overdrive ratio, whereas the Honda has two.
Both cars feature all-round independent suspension, with the Accord having the superior suspension setup, double wishbones up front and multi-links behind. Toyota opted to go for a simpler set up, strutting the front with MacPhersons and using an uncomplicated dual-link suspension behind.
The Asian market's obsession for size is also set to benefit the Accord. It is taller, wider and also longer than the Camry. The Accord's wheelbase is also longer, but it weighs less than the Camry (1,475kg vs 1,510kg).
On paper comparisons favour the Accord. Despite being down on equipment against the Camry, the Accord has the more impressive technical bits and has a lower price tag to go with it. The Accord starts as the favourite. So, bring in the contestants.
The Test Cars
Honda's test car for the Accord 2.0 VTi-L is a five month old unit registered specially for media testing. It is Honda Malaysia's only demo car for that variant, and thus, has changed quite a few hands (i.e. well run-in), having clocked 7,311km on the odometer when I picked it up.
At the 'Driving: The Honda's DNA' event in Sepang during the previous week, this car was assigned to the track course, which meant it went through a whole day of high-revving and hard-braking torture. Nevertheless, I was assured by HM personnel that the car was put through a comprehensive service before being handed to me, with new tyres and brake pads thrown in.
For the Camry, UMW Toyota Motor had only registered a demo unit of the 2.4V. This 2.0G test car was obtained by a special arrangement within their organization. It is only two months newer than the Accord test car, but has clocked far less miles. Its digital odometer read 1,714km when I first twisted its key.
Our Grey Metallic coloured Camry test car is fitted with the optional Aerokit package, which adds RM2,650 to its RM154,990 price tag. The Accord test car, meanwhile, is finished in Taffeta White colour, and goes for RM149,800 as tested.
Aesthetics
Neither the Camry nor the Accord are ugly cars by any means, although which is the better looking car is entirely up to taste. Although measurements say that the Accord is the bigger car, parking them side-by-side we see the Camry having more visual bulk.
The Accord is the more eye-catching of the two with its sharper and more aggressive styling cues. Even if the Camry is fitted with the Aerokit package, there's no argument that the Accord is the sportier and more dynamic looking car.
Taking a contrary approach, the Camry's styling is elegant and more restrained. In this facelift, Toyota has made some very visible improvements in the Camry's styling elements and these small touches make it a far more attractive looking car than its predecessor.
Though the Accord has the bolder and catchier styling, after sunset, the show belongs to the Camry. The Toyota puts on quite a light show at night, with the revamped Audi-aping LED tail-lights looking great when switched on. I'm willing to bet that Honda will follow suit with LED tails when the Accord is due for a refit. The Camry's auto-leveling HID headlamps also ensure that its front is better illuminated than the Accord's.
![]() |
| 5A/T gives Accord (left) advantage in refinement & FC over Camry's 4A/T (right) |
![]() |
| |








Orang biasa pun sudah boleh agak, mana mungkin mahkamah persekutuan akan gugurkan kes Anwar sedangkan kes sudah berjalan dan mengugurkan kes sebelum didengar adalah satu prinsip yang melanggar kedaulatan undang-undang.
Belum pernah ada seorang tertuduh boleh menangguh kes sehingga lebih 25 kali. Siap mahu gugur kes, gugur pasukan pendakwaan dan gugur hakim. Penjenayah perang Saddam Hussien pun tak buat macam itu.
Hanya orang buta sahaja yang masih percaya Anwar tidak bersalah. Daripada tak berani bersumpah sehingga tangguh kes, peguam beliau sendiri Karpal Singh merupakan orang yang mendedahkan kes liwat pertama Anwar semasa tahun 1998 dahulu, 5 bulan sebelum Anwar dipecat Mahathir.
Berani kerana benar, takut kerana salah. Sudah terang lagi bersuluh, ramai bekas penyokong Anwar sudah mula buka mata. Jika dahulu mereka percaya ini merupakan satu konspirasi namun hari ini tidak lagi. Mereka semakin sangsi apabila melihat gerak geri dan gelagat Anwar dari hari ke hari.
Saya mengesyaki sesuatu akan mengapa Anwar selalu mahu tangguh kes. Seolah-olah beliau sedang menantikan sesuatu untuk dijadikan bukti dalam pembelaannya. Namun sehingga hari ini beliau masih belum mendapatkannya dan oleh itu beliau mahu tangguh, tangguh dan tangguh lagi.
Apa yang Anwar nantikan? Itu sama-sama kita lihat. Buat Wan Azizah, anda merupakan seorang manusia paling tabah di dunia. Sesungguhnya kita tak mungkin jumpa lagi wanita sebaik dan sesabar anda. Namun pasti anda terfikir sampai bila anda boleh bersabar lagi?
Keluarga anda mempunyai wang yang banyak. Sangat banyak. Gunakanlah wang tersebut untuk berhijrah ke luar negara dan mulakan hidup baru. Bawa sekali anak-anak dan cucu kerana percaya lah, kali ini anwar pasti akan sangkut.
Dia boleh tangguh sampai bila pun dia mahu, tapi masyarakat akan terus sabar menunggu sehingga lakonan beliau tamat. Saya dan rakan blogger lain termasuk komentar-komentar setia saya mahupun Saiful Buhari sendiri tidak akan penat menulis demi menegakkan kebenaran. Kami tidak akan jemu kerana kali ini Anwar tidak akan terlepas lagi.
Konspirasi UMNO
Jika kita ingat kembali laporan polis dibuat oleh Saiful selepas pilihanraya ke-12 berlangsung. Kalau anda mahu katakan ini konspirasi BN, mengapa tidak sebelum pilihanraya lagi UMNO rancang dan letupkan semua ini?
Kerana apa? Kerana BN tidak yakin ini akan mempengaruhi pengundi? Anda silap. Pada pilihanraya umum ke-12, BN dibawah pimpinan Pak Lah sangat lah yakin akan menang lebih besar dan kembali merampas Kelantan. Siap-siap Awang Adek Husin sudah dilambung seolah-olah bakal cuci kaki masuk pejabat MB Kelantan. Namun BN tewas dengan teruk.
Apa perlu coffee boy?
Satu perkara yang saya masih tidak faham mengapa Anwar perlu seorang coffee boy. Adakah beliau terlalu sakit pinggang sehingga nak buat kopi sendiri pun tak reti? Atau Wan Azizah yang tak tahu bezakan kopi dan serbuk bontot kuali?
Rakyat bukan bodoh lagi. Seperti mana BN telah tersilap langkah merendahkan kemampuan rakyat untuk berfikir, begitu juga dengan Anwar. Rakyat terus menjadi pemerhati terbaik dan akan menjatuhkan hukuman apabila tiba saat dan waktunya.
Sepandai-pandai tupai melompat akhirnya jatuh ke tanah juga. Kali ini Anwar tidak akan terlepas. Kami akan teruskan apa yang telah kami mulakan sehingga semuanya selesai.
Kepada Wan Azizah, anda akan menjadi saksi pasukan pembelaan. Apa yang anda tunggu lagi? Anda sudah lama bersabar. Kini anda diberi peluang untuk menceritakan segala-galanya kepada mahkamah. Ini lah masanya untuk anda ’smash’ bola tanggung kepada muka Anwar.
Artikel yang bagus dibaca ini diambil daripada http://writtenbyhim.wordpress.com